今天好教育好教育小編（HaojiaOyu.nEt）為大家?guī)砹苏垎?023年2月23日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案（2023雅思閱讀真題全面解析及答案(2)），希望能幫助到大家，一起來看看吧！

本文目錄一覽：

• 1、請問2023年2月23日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案
• 2、2023雅思閱讀真題全面解析及答案(2)
• 3、2023年11月2日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案

請問2023年2月23日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案

您好，我是專注留學考試規(guī)劃和留學咨詢的小鐘老師。選擇留學是人生重要的決策之一，而作為您的指導，我非常高興能為您提供最準確的留學解答和規(guī)劃。無論您的問題是關于考試準備、專業(yè)選擇、申請流程還是學校信息，我都在這里為您解答。更多留學資訊和學校招生介紹，歡迎隨時訪問。 前兩天最新一期的雅思考試圓滿結束了，真題及答案也已經新鮮出爐，想必大家都非常感興趣吧。來和小鐘老師看一看2023年2月23日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案。 Passage 1 文章題材：說明文（人文歷史） 文章題目：絲綢之路 文章難度：★★ 文章內容：暫無 題型及數量：7填空題+6判斷題 題目及答案： 1、robe 2、taxes 3、gold 4、待補充 5、foreign 6、thread 7、待補充 8、T 9、NG 10、F 11、NG 12、T 13、F 可參考真題：C11T3P1：The Story of Silk Passage 2 文章題材：說明文（自然動植物） 文章題目：猛犸象 文章難度：★★★★ 文章內容：文章介紹了猛犸象及其滅絕的原因猜想。 題型及數量：7填空+6匹配 題目及答案： 14. hunting 15. overkill model 16. disease/hyperdisease 17. empirical evidence 18. climatic instability 19. geographical 20. younger Dryas event 21. A 22. B 23. A 24. B 25. B 26. C 可參考真題：C9T1P3：The History of the Tortoise 考試原文： Mammoth Kill Mammoth is any species of the extinct genus Mammuthus， proboscideans commonly equipped with long， curved tusks and in northern species， a covering of long hair. They lived from the Ptiocene epoch from around 5 million years ago， into the Hotocene at about 4，500 years ago， and were members of the family Elephantidae， which contains， along with mammoths， the two genera of modern elephants and their ancestors. A Like their modern relatives， mammoths were quite large. The largest known species reached heights in the region of 4m at the shoulder and weights up t0 8 tonnes， while exceptionally large males may have exceeded 12 tonnes. However， most species of mammoth were only about as large as a modern Asian elephant. Both sexes bore tusks. A first， *all set appeared at about the age of six months and these were replaced at about 18 months by the permanent set. Growth of the permanent set was at a rate of about l t0 6 inches per year. Based on studies of their close relatives， the modem elephants， mammoths probably had a gestation period of 22 months， resulting in a single calf being born. Their social structure was probably the same as that of African and Asian elephants， with females living in herds headed by a matriarch， whilst hulls lived solitary lives or formed loose groups after sexual maturity. B MEXICO CITY-Although it’s hard to imagine in this age of urban sprawl and automobiles， North America once belonged to mammoths， camels， ground sloths as large as cows， bear-size beavers and other formidable beasts. Some 11，000 years ago， however， these large bodied mammals and others-about 70 species in all-disappeared. Their demise coincided roughly with the arrival of humans in the New World and dramatic climatic change-factors that have inspired several theories about the die-off. Yet despite decades of scientific investigation， the exact cause remains a mystery. Now new findings offer support to one of these controversial hypotheses： that human hunting drove this megafaunal menagerie （ 巨型動物獸群）to extinction. The overkill model emerged in the 1960s， when it was put forth by Paul S. Martin of the University of Arizona. Since then， critics have charged that no evidence exists to support the idea that the first Americans hunted to the extent necessary to cause these extinctions. But at the annual meeting of the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology in Mexico City last October， paleoecologist John Alroy of the University of California at Santa Barbara argued that， in fact， hunting-driven extinction is not only plausible， it was unavoidable. He has determined， using a computer simulation that even a very modest amount of hunting would have wiped these animals out. C Assuming an initial human population of 100 people that grew no more than 2 percent annually， Alroy determined that if each band of， say， 50 people killed 15 to 20 large mammals a year， humans could have eliminated the animal populations within 1，000 years. Large mammals in particular would have been vulnerable to the pressure because they have longer gestation periods than *aller mammals and their young require extended care. D Not everyone agrees with Alroy’s asses*ent. For one， the results depend in part on population-size estimates for the extinct animals-figures that are not necessarily reliable. But a more specific critici* comes from mammalogist Ross D. E. MacPhee of the American Museum of Natural History in New York City， who points out that the relevant archaeological record contains barely a dozen examples of stone points embedded in mammoth bones （and none， it should be noted， are known from other megafaunal remains）-hardly what one might expect if hunting drove these animals to extinction. Furthermore， some of these species had huge rangesthe giant Jefferson’s ground sloth， for example， lived as far north as the Yukon and as far south as Mexicowhich would have made slaughtering them in numbers sufficient to cause their extinction rather implausible， he says. E MacPhee agrees that humans most likely brought about these extinctions （as well as others around the world that coincided with human arrival）， but not directly. Rather he suggests that people may have introduced hyperlethal disease， perhaps through their dogs or hitchhiking vermin， which then spread wildly among the immunologically naive species of the New World. As in the overkill model， populations of large mammals would have a harder time recovering. Repeated outbreaks of a hyperdisease could thus quickly drive them to the point of no return. So far MacPhee does not have empirical evidence for the hyperdisease hypothesis， and it won’t be easy to come by： hyperlethal disease would kill far too quickly to leave its signature on the bones themselves. But he hopes that *yses of tissue and DNA from the last mammoths to perish will eventually reveal murderous microbes. F The third explanation for what brought on this North American extinction does not involve human beings. Instead， its proponents blame the loss on the weather. The Pleistocene epoch witnessed considerable climatic instability， explains paleontologist Russell W. Graham of the Denver Museum of Nature and Science. As a result， certain habitats disappeared， and species that had once formed communities split apart. For some animals， this change brought opportunity. For much of the megafauna， however， the increasingly homogeneous environment left them with shrinking geographical ranges-a death sentence for large animals， which need large ranges. Although these creatures managed to maintain viable populations through most of the Pleistocene， the final major fluctuation-the so-called Younger Dryas eventpushed them over the edge， Graham says. For his part， Alroy is convinced that human hunters demolished the titans of the Ice Age. The overkill model explains everything the disease and climate scenarios explain， he asserts， and makes accurate predictions about which species would eventually go extinct. “Personally， I’m a vegetarian，” he remarks， “and I find all of this kind of gross-but believable.” Passage 3 文章題材：說明文（人文研究） 文章題目：大師是怎樣煉成的 文章難度：★★★ 文章內容：待補充 題型及數量：4選擇+6判斷+4填空 題目及答案： 27、C 28、C 29、A 30、A 31、NG 32、T 33、NG 34、NG 35、F 36、待補充 37、tuition 38、eight 39、four 40、inherited 可參考真題：C10T2P2：Gifted Children and Learning 以上信息希望能幫助您在留學申請的道路上少走彎路。如果您還有更多問題或需要深入探討，不要猶豫，您可以在我們的留學官方網站上找到更豐富的考試資訊、留學指導和*專家咨詢服務。我們的團隊始終站在您的角度，為您的留學夢想全力以赴。祝您申請順利！

2023雅思閱讀真題全面解析及答案(2)

您好，我是專注留學考試規(guī)劃和留學咨詢的小鐘老師。在追尋留學夢想的路上，選擇合適的學校和專業(yè)，準備相關考試，都可能讓人感到迷茫和困擾。作為一名有經驗的留學顧問，我在此為您提供全方位的專業(yè)咨詢和指導。歡迎隨時提問！ 小鐘老師為大家?guī)?023雅思閱讀真題全面解析及答案(2)，歡迎大家參考!更多相關內容請關注本站! 2023雅思閱讀真題全面解析及答案(2) 原文與譯文： Yesterday, in the House of Commons, Charles Kennedy’s parliamentary colleagues gave moving tributes to his life. There is never a rush, of course, to speak ill of the dead, but these tributes had the clear ring of sincerity. David Cameron said his “character and courage inspired us all”, and Nick Clegg that he always put people before politics. Outside the commons, colleagues and friends have spoken repeatedly of Kennedy’s compassion, decency, and principled nature as well as of his ongoing battle with human frailty in the form of alcoholi*. It seems Charles Kennedy displayed what the New York Times Columnist David Brooks would call “eulogy virtues”. In his most recent book “The Road to Character”, Brooks contrasts eulogy virtues like kindness, faithfulness and humility with what he calls resume virtues - the kind of things we put on our CV. He’s convinced that both eulogy virtues and resume virtues take work to develop, and is worried that western society pushes us to put our efforts into the ones that will help improve our careers, not our characters. It's the age old question- what makes a good life? How do we go deeper amongst the clamour of a culture that monetises status anxiety and defines us by what earn, own or look like? David Brook’s call for us to do the hard work of developing character, to cultivate self-restraint and self-suspicion in the age of the selfie stick, isn't really controversial. It's obvious, when we stop to think about it, that the real legacies of our lives aren’t job titles, twitter followers or cellulite free thighs. But how do we develop the eulogy virtues, when the gravitational pull of the self is so strong? Christians would be the first to acknowledge that these virtues don't come naturally. The church’s hunch is that change happens through vulnerable, committed relationships. To overcome the tyrant self we must confess our frailty and darkest tendencies - first to God, and then to others. Behavioural science is beginning to add evidence to what religions have long understood - virtue develops best in relational communities. Not short term communities of self interest made up of “people like us”, but awkward, diverse, grace filled communities, established for the long term. The New Testament encourages Christians to be part of communities like these, to encourage one another, bear with each other and create space for the hard conversations. To keep reminding each other of the virtues that matter and the things that last. These kind of communities aren't of course unique to Christianity, and they are often far from perfect, but if we want to be remembered not for our fleeting achievements but our depth of character, they might be the best hope we have. 昨天，在下議院，查爾斯·肯尼迪的同事為他的一生發(fā)表了催人淚下的悼詞。當然，死者為大，沒有人會在死者尸骨未寒時說別人的不是。但是這些悼詞很明顯是真誠的。大衛(wèi)·卡梅倫說他的“品格和勇氣鼓舞了我們所有人”，尼克·克萊格說他總是把民眾放在政治前面。在下議院外，他的同事和朋友多次提到他的同情心，政治和原則性，并不斷與人類酗酒的劣根性做斗爭。 查爾斯·肯尼迪似乎體現了《*》專欄作家David Brooks所說的“悼詞美德”。在他最近的書《通往品格的道路》中，Brooks將善良，忠誠等悼詞美德與他所說的簡歷美德做了對比——也就是我們寫在簡歷上的品德。他相信，悼詞美德和簡歷美德都需要發(fā)揚。他擔心西方世界導致我們努力塑造幫助我們職業(yè)發(fā)展的品德，而不是幫助性格成長的品德。 我們又要說一個老生常談的問題——怎樣才是好的生活?在宣揚金錢至上，追求社會地位，根據收入，財產和外表來定義我們的浮躁社會，我們怎樣才能深入剖析自己的內心世界? David Brook呼吁我們努力塑造品格，在自我吹噓的環(huán)境中培養(yǎng)*和自審的品格，這并無爭議。很明顯，當我們停下來認真思考的時候，我們真正寶貴的財產并不是我們的職位，推特粉絲或沒有脂肪的大腿。但是在自我的萬有引力如此強大的情況下，我們怎樣培養(yǎng)悼詞美德? 基督徒們將最先站出來承認這些美德并不是與生俱來的?；浇探塘x認為，改變是在脆弱忠誠的關系中發(fā)生的。要克服殘暴的自我，我們必須承認我們的脆弱和最黑暗的本性——首先是對上帝，然后是對自己。 行為科學不斷有證據表明各宗教很久以前就已經理解的問題——道德在關系社會中發(fā)展得最快。不是由“跟我一樣的人”組成的短暫的利益團體，而是長期的，尷尬的，多樣化的人組成的團體。<<新約圣經>>鼓勵基督徒成為這樣的團體的一部分，鼓勵大家相互容忍，為艱難的對話打造空間。互相提醒非常重要的道德和永恒持久的事情。當然，這些團體并不是對基督教來說獨一無二的，而通常并不完美，但是，如果我們不是想要人們記住卓越的成就，而是希望人們記住我們的品德，這或許是我們最大的希望。 詞匯解釋： 1.moving adj. 感人的 It is very moving to see how much strangers can care for each other... 看到陌生人之間這般彼此關照，實在令人感動。 2.inspire vt. 鼓舞 These herbs will inspire you to try out all sorts of exotic-flavoured dishes! 這些香草會激發(fā)你去品嘗各種異國風味的菜肴! 3.repeatedly adv.反復地，重復地 A list of items is repeatedly flashed up on the screen. 一個選項列表反復出現在屏幕上。 4.ongoing adj.不間斷的，進行的 There is an ongoing debate on the issue. 對此問題的爭論一直沒有間斷過。 5.convince vt.使相信，說服 I'm not going to believe it myself, never mind convince anyone else. 我自己都不會相信，更別提說服別人了。 6.clamour n. 喧嘩聲，喧鬧 She could hear a clamour in the road outside. 她能聽得見外面路上的吵鬧聲。 7.acknowledge vt.承認 You have to acknowledge that we live in a racist society. 你得承認我們生活在一個有種族偏見的社會中。 8.fleeting adj. 疾馳的，飛逝的;短暫的 The world is like a fleeting show. 人世如白駒過隙。 希望以上的答復能對您的留學申請有所幫助。如果您有任何更詳細的問題或需要進一步的協(xié)助，我強烈推薦您訪問我們的留學官方網站 ，在那里您可以找到更多專業(yè)的留學考試規(guī)劃和留學資料以及*的咨詢服務。祝您留學申請順利！

2023年11月2日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案

您好，我是專注留學考試規(guī)劃和留學咨詢的小鐘老師。在追尋留學夢想的路上，選擇合適的學校和專業(yè)，準備相關考試，都可能讓人感到迷茫和困擾。作為一名有經驗的留學顧問，我在此為您提供全方位的專業(yè)咨詢和指導。歡迎隨時提問！ 上周末完成了最新一期的雅思考試，大家一定很想知道自己考得怎么樣？來和小鐘老師看看2023年11月2日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案。 Passage 1 Russia ballet俄羅斯芭蕾/俄羅斯戲劇發(fā)展 原文分段大意：第一段17世紀是教會眼制舞蹈發(fā)展，然后各個國家對其歐洲的，什么 concert什么舞蹈的演變等，俄羅斯芭蓄舞里面提到了外來的教師什么的。題型是TFNG和filling the table Questions1-6TRUE/ FALSE/ NOT GIVEN判斷題 1說18世紀中期芭蕾流行沒---T 2音樂教師數量是否上訴---F 319世紀芭蕾在俄羅斯才 popular---NG 418世紀中期跳芭蕾舞是不是和宗教意見沖突被官方 reject---T 5還問 enthusia*是否局限于皇家還是什么的---T 6問一個人進入什么組織是否被拒絕了---F 倒數第二個人問一個人是否stop Questions 7-13） Filling the table （no more than 2 words /a number） 7-8）第一個theater的建立者Alex是個學院的director 9最后一段末尾講到一個人很有成就的最后 win worldwidepopularity 10 dance anddress code 11引入了法律相關的舞蹈，社會生活 12 Pushkin普希金-創(chuàng)作獲得了成功 Successfulpublication 13一個人 comic擺脫了myth passage 2 the reconstruction of community 14 paragraph A---vi Introduction of a social housing community with unexpected high standard 15 paragraph B---viii closer relationship among neighbors in original site 16 paragraph C---v problems arise then the mentality of alienation developed later 17 paragraph D---iii details of plans for the community’s makeover and upgrade 18 paragraph E---ix different need from a makeup of a low financial background should be considered 19 paragraph F---vii a practical design and need assist and cooperate in future 20 paragraph G---ii a good tendency of strengthening the supervision 21 design should meet the need of mix-raced cultural background---D 22 for better living environment， regulations and social control should be imperative---B 23 organising more community’s activities helps strengthening relationship in community---C 24 people complain about the high living24 density 25 the designs of many25 architects 26 Build a house within low26 budget 27 in its own27 garden Passage 3 古犀 希望以上的答復能對您的留學申請有所幫助。如果您有任何更詳細的問題或需要進一步的協(xié)助，我強烈推薦您訪問我們的留學官方網站 ，在那里您可以找到更多專業(yè)的留學考試規(guī)劃和留學資料以及*的咨詢服務。祝您留學申請順利！

以上就是好教育整理的請問2023年2月23日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案（2023雅思閱讀真題全面解析及答案(2)）相關內容，想要了解更多信息，敬請查閱好教育。